<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Forget to Vote!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/</link>
	<description>Fresh New Design Featured Often</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/#comment-55803</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/#comment-55803</guid>
		<description>Yawn.

Sorry to be so teenager-ish about it but is there ANYTHING in these entries that we haven't seen a hundred times before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yawn.</p>
<p>Sorry to be so teenager-ish about it but is there ANYTHING in these entries that we haven&#8217;t seen a hundred times before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: becky</title>
		<link>http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/#comment-55801</link>
		<dc:creator>becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/#comment-55801</guid>
		<description>I agree with you guys.  I didn't see anything all that original or that really caught my eye.  None of them even seemed worthy of the magazine.   There were some really really really bad entries which were fun to look through.  God I'm mean!

Becky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you guys.  I didn&#8217;t see anything all that original or that really caught my eye.  None of them even seemed worthy of the magazine.   There were some really really really bad entries which were fun to look through.  God I&#8217;m mean!</p>
<p>Becky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stratos</title>
		<link>http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/#comment-55797</link>
		<dc:creator>Stratos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/#comment-55797</guid>
		<description>Not impressed, boring conventional decoration...of course I could not expect anything more with Domino...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not impressed, boring conventional decoration&#8230;of course I could not expect anything more with Domino&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristiina</title>
		<link>http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/#comment-55773</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristiina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.designpublic.com/2007/11/05/dont-forget-to-vote/#comment-55773</guid>
		<description>They were OK. I was not impressed. And I agree the striped room was definitely most interesting space in the punch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were OK. I was not impressed. And I agree the striped room was definitely most interesting space in the punch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
